Simon,
Many thanks for your time in producing such a comprehensive reply and taking it in the spirit in which it was intended, i.e. feedback. Normally I would not bother in making such a post, the reason I did was because I cared.
There are many out there who claim much, but offer little and it takes a long time to discover those which you can trust or those with words that have merit. Both this site and Marc, I hold in esteem, so was disappointed when I (wrongly) believed that I was being spammed.
An overreaction on my part! Thank you for the offer to sort out my email on the database. Yes, I am on two mailing lists, one as a subscriber to FMP, and the other as an ordinary member of this site. I am happy with this, so will take into account when Marc spams me againAt least he always has something noteworthy to say!
I appreciate better now the costs in running a site like this, and endorsements through affiliate links are a necessity. However, affiliate endorsements only work if they have at least a similar quality and diligence as yourselves, otherwise you will start diluting your own credibility. However, I did enjoy the Elevation Group video and was worth the time invested to watch it.
Like you (though I haven't bought it), I am following LeoTraderPro as well.
As way of a token contribution and apology to my over reaction, your point 2 above (post #15) is not quite accurate.
The Risk setting allows you to set the lot size in one of two ways.
For a number greater than 0, e.g. 0.05, it will use that figure for the lot size entry.
For a number less than 0, e.g. -2, it will interpret that as using 2% of equity, constrained by the min and max lot size values that you enter. Hope that helps.
Mort




LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
At least he always has something noteworthy to say!


Reply With Quote




