LMAX

Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: CFTC New Potential Rules Kill USA Forex Traders?

  1. #1
    marc walton's Avatar
    marc walton is online now Administrator
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Canary Islands
    Posts
    389

    Default CFTC New Potential Rules Kill USA Forex Traders?

    An important proposal was announced by the CFTC on January 13, 2010, which will affect forex traders whose accounts are with a US regulated broker. This proposal will affect any traders trading with US based forex brokers
    What is the proposal?

    There are a raft of regulatory ideas they wish to implement, some of which make sense but the following little gem, hidden in amongst it could kill retail forex traders who wish to trade with a USA based broker. Not to mention that it will cost jobs & businesses in the US as their customers depart for foreign brokers. So double wammy for the USA tax man. Here is the proposal "Leverage in retail forex customer accounts would be subject to a 10-to-1 limitation" CFTC Seeks Public Comment on Proposed Regulations Regarding Retail FOREX Transactions . The proposal means that margin requirements would change from the current 1% of notional position size to 10% of notional position size. If your leverage is cut by 90% or more it will be virtually impossible to be a profitable retail trader unless you have a (very) large account to play with.

    See T C's Brilliant Reply to this nonsense below:

  2. #2
    marc walton's Avatar
    marc walton is online now Administrator
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Canary Islands
    Posts
    389

    Default Brilliant Reply to US Government Plans to Kill Forex part 1

    Brilliant reply from one of our memebrs to USA government proposals to kill of retail forex traders:

    PART 1

    January 21, 2010

    T C
    Costa Rica

    David Stawick
    Secretary Commodity 
Futures Trading Commision
    1155 21st Street N.W.
    Washington
    DC 20581

    RE: Regulation of Retail Forex RIN 3038-AC61

    Well congratulations are indeed in order for your office has indeed exceeded the normal level of completely brain dead, meddling, idiotic, useless, stupid, ill conceived ideas ever coming from bureaucrats. I will make no apologies for my strong language enclosed in this message as being polite most certainly will not get your attention as if anything will, nor does being polite show what contempt I have for you for thinking you have any right to run my business.


    FYI I am a full time trader that lives in Costa Rica not in the great communist state of USA. Your proposal here would, I am most certain, be what Lenin and Stalin would think to be a wonderful idea however in the real world of free enterprise your concept to put it mildly is offensive, aside from being completely useless and ineffective. The following are my list of why such nonsense should not be considered and if the collective IQ of your office was any higher than that of a turnip you should have figured this out long before releasing this cr*p to the public.


    • What I choose to risk in my business is my business it is not your business or anyone else’s for that matter. Risk is a part of any business and is assessed by those who succeed in how to manage such. Without risk there is never a gain in anything. Any good economy is based on such, without it there just is not going to be economic prosperity.



    • Your office has zero capacity in advising me how I should manage my risk in this or any other business for that matter.



    • Your proposal would in fact destroy any profit potential that exists in my business I would stop trading if these conditions were ever imposed upon me (in your dreams such will happen) by such wise soles as yourselves after all I am just an idiot that should bow to Caesar!



    • These margins have been in effect for decades without causing any kind of mass financial disaster such as those that your office or similar types of offices have so handily supervised and regulated over these past years. As the saying goes if it works do not fix it. Well this system has worked fine for many years and has no need for you clowns to come and screw with it.



    • Yes those that do not learn how to manage their risk in this business can and often do loose money until they either quit trading or learn how to do it like thousands of other traders do. However with that being said changing the margins only dumbs it down to a lower common denominator of fool that should not be a trader in the first place and I hate to inform you of this but what the system does not need is many more stupid traders and that is all that this proposal is going to do is breed a larger amount of people that should not be in the business in the first place.



    • Today there is a greater supply of competent private education sources for traders than ever in the past to help them educate themselves and ALL OF THESE first and foremost teach risk management, hence the tools are already in place for those that do their homework in learning how to be a trader and how to manage their margins and risk levels without some moron in Washington telling them how to I might add!



    • Your proposal is sooooooo incredibly non-functional in practical reality it is not funny. Only a bureaurat with his head firmly planted up his ass could come up with something so f*ng stupid and out of the zone of reality. Yes the retail forex trading market has grown exponentially over the past ten years. Gee I wonder why that is??? Might it be due to a new novel concept called the Internet perhaps you fools in Washington have heard of it???? Well those of us out there in the real world have not only heard of it but discovered that we can now trade like an institution now that we have on-line platforms from all over the g world to use. Now that is where the joke of this whole story there-in lies. I ask you one elementary question, why should or would a trader like myself allow a bunch of brain dead fools to come and destroy our businesses when we can simple click a mouse a few times to move our business and assets to elsewhere in the world that has respect for our inalienable right to conduct our business as we see fit rather than by some over paid fat cat fool in Washington? You think the US industrial machine has problems with outsourcing and all manufacturing moving off shore well that is nothing compared to the sh*t storm you are going to stir up with your moronic ideas. With typical outsourcing it can take years for a US corporation to move off shore however in today’s digital age that is nothing compared to the speed that funds can and will exit from US based brokerage accounts it will be so fast and vicious it will have your heads spinning. You will have many brokerage firms firing most of their staff as their funds on deposit disappear in a puff of smoke and I might add when you piss the customer like me off you NEVER, NEVER, NEVER get another chance we are gone for ever. The only thing your stupid proposal will create here will be a total blood bath of this industry, US based jobs provided by this industry will dry up by a minimum of 75% as the smart money flees the sinking ship!!!!!!



    • To be equally blunt, to fit in with the rest of my message, I saw this coming with the type of stupid rules being imposed upon me by the NFA back in August. When some group of all knowing all seeing fools start to tell me how to run my business and how they are removing valuable tools that I need to function my business because they know better than me then I say it is time to relocate to friendlier more intelligent jurisdictions. If you should take your collective heads out of your ass for long enough (not very likely) you might actually realize that there are dozens of locations outside of the US that are more than glad to handle my accounts and earn fees from me without interfering in how I run my business. All this accomplished with a few clicks of a mouse, no brick and mortar type of business problems to resolve in this type of move and all done at the speed of light. Hence I exited the good old communist state of USA back in October as I refuse to have assholes like you run my business for me. Now I was in the first wave and many of your fellow American traders have not had such a violent reaction to the first onslaught of unacceptable changes but this new all out attack on the traders’ rights will not be acceptable to the majority of such and they will simply drop off of your radar. Their money and the jobs it produces will be gone forever!!! WELCOME TO THE INFORMATION AGE!!!

    SEE PART 2 Below

  3. #3
    marc walton's Avatar
    marc walton is online now Administrator
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Canary Islands
    Posts
    389

    Default

    Part 2 Brilliant Reply to Us government plans to kill retail forex traders

    My final big issue is to question even what are you think you are really trying to accomplish here in the fist place other than to p*ss off the traders hence destroying an entire industry? What is it you fools think you are accomplishing that can’t be described as fixing what is not broke? I have another suggestion for you, why not take the man-hours of your employees and start working on fixing the huge problems you have created in the international financial markets. Have you thought maybe you should look at solving the real problems of the consumers at large and the entire USA economy? Your f*ck ups created by Wall Street have caused huge damage all over the world as your lack of regulatory authority have been demonstrated by wonderful examples of what Enron and the sub-prime fiasco have caused to financial markets. When you fix these problems that obviously scream out for more and much tighter regulation of the big fish (thieves of Wall Street) then and only then those of us small fish that you want to regulate to death might consider your regulation or opinion of any relevance what so ever. You bureaucrats have sat on your asses while the investment bankers created phony Enron paper that then had their retail arms sell that same crap onto the suspecting public and you did zip to stop it or fix it after it happened when even the most basic of financial moron could figure out there was something seriously wrong in the regulation of securities off of Wall street. Not a single person even tried over this conflict of interest and scam, my isn’t that effective regulation to protect the public???? No in effect you have protected the perpetrators of these scams not the victims of such. If that was not bad enough now they have done the same dam thing all over again but on a much more ambitious scale to flog the same type of crap paper, being sub-primes to victims all over the world, all under your so called regulation. To say the least Washington should be embarrassed about what they oversaw and regulated with the same effectiveness as hiring a fox to guard the chicken coop! Now why don’t you fools go work on something big that clearly needs fixing but has not been fixed yet! Hell it is not even being discussed as to how this happened or why this final gargantuan f*ckup even occurred off of Wall Street in the first place. Hence it is going to happen again and the bankers and brokers (thieves) of Wall Street will continue doing the same shit AND YET YOU HAVE THE AUDACITY TO THINK YOU HAVE THE RIGHT OR ABILITY TO TELL ME HOW TO MANAGE MY MONEY!!!!!!!! That is one real sad, sad, sad joke!

    This proposal is nothing but a bad joke that only a fool would follow in the first place and that is all that will follow this new method all the real players are going to become ghosts just like I have done.

    This reminds me of a something Einstein said, “Only two thing are infinite the universe and the depth of human stupidity and I have some doubts about the universe.” Well your proposed changes certainly prove he was right on the depth of human stupidity.

    Join the real world with the rest of us and garbage can this garbage!!!

    With total disgust and amazement,

    T C Costa Rica

  4. #4
    baboon's Avatar
    baboon is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Oxford, UK
    Posts
    23

    Angry Bad news, but great opportunity

    On the face of it, this is not good news.

    However, all that will happen is that NFA regulated brokers in the USA will die a death. Liquidity providers and off-shore brokers will take advantage.

    This will actually be great news as the IRS won't have a clue where US based customer's money is held anymore!

    It's just a shame that decent hard working people at the brokerages will join the millions of unemployed in the US.

    I agree whole heartedly that the morons behind this should concentrate on fixing the derivatives markets that created the toxic assets of the crdit crunch in the first place.

    I have heard it quoted by several economists that these derivatives form a toxic black hole of US$1.25 QUADRILLION! This has been covered up by the bail out and has not gone away.

    These bureaucrats should focus on sorting out this huge mess and ending the Federal Reserve, not meddling in the affairs of retail traders who have done nothing wrong.

    It seems that, if you thought the Nanny state here in the UK is bad, Obama's regime is going to be a whole lot worse...

    Simon.

  5. #5
    marc walton's Avatar
    marc walton is online now Administrator
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Canary Islands
    Posts
    389

    Default USA Forex Brokers Unite to Fight CFTC Stupidity

    Most of the USA Forex brokers have understandably formed a coalition to fight the nonsensical idea currently being floated by the CFTC which would effectively kill off most USA based retail forex tradersas well as lose 1000's of USA jobs. They have collectively and individually issued statements This is a copy of
    FXCM’s response to the CFTC’s new proposal, sent to their clients:



    FXCM, just like all US forex brokers, has issued a statement to its clients with regards to the new CFTC proposals. FXCM, just like all the members of the FXDC coalition, feels that such drastic measures will eventually cause plenty of damage to US retail forex traders and the industry as a whole. While FXCM understands that increased regulation and transparency are very important to make this industry as healthy as possible, the measures introduced by CFTC are not an adequate response to that.
    Dear Client:


    In early January, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC)—the U.S. government agency responsible for the regulation of retail foreign exchange—proposed new rules for off-exchange retail foreign exchange. If enacted in their current form, these rules would have an enormous impact on the U.S. forex industry. The proposed rules call for restricting leverage to 10-to-1, even for the most widely traded currency pairs.



    To read the full 193 page text of the proposed rules, please visit http://www.cftc.gov/ucm/groups/public/@newsroom/documents/file/forexrulesproposal.pdf.


    While FXCM believes that increased regulation brings credibility to our growing industry, we feel that imposing onerous regulations is counterproductive in the marketplace. FXCM is actively lobbying against restricting leverage to 10-to-1. We are working with other Forex Dealer Members (FDMs), as part of the Foreign Exchange Dealers Coalition (FXDC), to provide a united industry front to lobby congress and the CFTC.


    PLEASE NOTE: We are in a critical sixty-day period during which the CFTC will accept comments from the public, including industry participants, on proposed rule changes. If you would like to voice your concern for or against the proposal, you can contact the CFTC directly by sending an e-mail to secretary@cftc.gov with “Regulation of Retail Forex” in the subject line.


    The CFTC is required to publish comments on the proposed rules and has the power, although not required, to change the proposed rules based on the comments received. For more information, please e-mail FXCM’s Director of Governmental Affairs, Charlie Delano, at cdelano@fxcm.com.


    Best regards,
    FXCM

LinkBacks (?)


Similar Threads

  1. Forex Trading Psychology – The Main reason Why Forex Traders Fail
    By marc walton in forum Trading Psychology
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 04-01-2012, 04:33 PM
  2. How the CFTC rulings affect American Fx traders
    By The Aslan Group in forum General Discussion on Forex Broker Services
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 29-09-2010, 04:57 PM
  3. Forex trading rules - forex lessons learned
    By marc walton in forum Forex Articles
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 29-07-2010, 12:10 PM
  4. Basic Rules For Forex Investors:
    By marc walton in forum Forex Articles
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 29-06-2010, 10:57 AM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •